Analysis of the Doctrine of the Trinity
Have been common in the understanding of those Christians that God was conceptualized into three elements, namely: God the Father (God the Father), God's son (Jesus the Christ) and God the Holy Spirit (The Holy Spirit); And all three of these persons in the belief they are one substance and one in unity.
The presence of Jesus called the children of God (the Son of God) in one element of the Christian deity, is not only seen as a metaphor (metaphor), but more likely in the true sense. Therefore the Lord's words the child is used here in a real sense, the word "God the Father" here should also be used also in the sense of "Father" true, because then it becomes true understanding.
But this would make an impossible thing to be accepted by common sense!
Because self "child" is actually from something, is unlikely to have a substance with the account of the "Father" of something is true as well.
Because on when the "substance" is one that is called a child, when it can not also "substance" which one is referred to as the Father. Nor vice versa, ie when a substance is referred to as the Father, can not as we call it is the same substance as the son of the Father.
When the substance of this one we call the Father, then where is the child matter?
Surely we all agree that any of the words we use to talk about God is merely a substitute for the word DIA (ie pronouns which of course is no word replaces, and said ZAT in the context of our discussion here is not the word of substances that can be divided into substances Zair, solid and gas.
Therefore, the Christian world has a plurality concept of God in one substance, then here has been a difficult dilemma, and in answer to this, they always escape on the answer: "The mystery of God is difficult to express."
A statement that tries to cover impotence Christians in providing an understanding of the doctrine of the deity they are contrary to common sense.
On one hand they give testimony to the Oneness of God, but on the other hand they are also forced to accept the presence of other elements as a god but the one God, the logic is, if the so-called substance of God the Father other than the substance of God the child, it will be obvious anyway that God is not One, but has become two (dualism deity and not monotheism).
Similarly, the inclusion of the third element of divinity, the Holy Spirit, so that further increase the elements of divinity are one to three persons distinct from one another so inevitably acknowledgment of the One God (monotheism principle) will be lost.
Especially with regard to their own self-God the Holy Spirit, in the book of the Bible (in-Indonesia often called al-kitab) is sometimes described as a fire, as the birds and so forth. And God the Holy Spirit, according to the Old Testament (the first part of the al-Kitab) is often present in the midst of people, both before the birth of Jesus, Jesus' existence in the midst of the disciples until the period after the absence of Jesus after the crucifixion.
And face it, back we mentioned that the elements of the Lord has been divided into three different substances. Because if it remains said to be still in one substance (one unit), then it also came to pass when the substance of God the Father is God substance substance God's child and then the child and substance of God the Father is also the substance of God's Holy Spirit.
The question now is, when the substance which was called the Father, where is the child?
And when the substance is one called a child of God, then where is God the Father and God the Holy Spirit? Therefore thou God there are three states in three different substances.
Because the first person who discriminate with unscrupulous second is 'sonship' and 'the fatherhood'. Child is not the Father and the Father is not a child!
So it was evident again that God is no longer Esa.
Therefore everyone who wants to use reason his mind properly will assume that the doctrine of the Trinity, not the nature Monotheism or to Esakan God but are more inclined to understand Polytheism (the belief system of many Gods).
Thus, it is apparent already that the doctrine is contrary to the teachings of all the prophets previous teaches that God is One in the true sense.
We see from the Old Testament, the New Testament (especially the four Gospels) until the Muslim holy book is the Koran, not found the concept of the plurality of divinity as that of the Christian world itself.
At the time, Adam never mentioned that God is three, as well as Abraham, David, Moses and the prophets before they come to Jesus himself never to teach the principles to-Tritunggalan God, especially with what is taught by the Prophet Muhammad Saw.
Furthermore when we analyze the concept of the Trinity is mentioned that the first person terbeda with All fatherhood, as he is referred to as God the Father (He is regarded as God's older), while the person of the second terbeda with sonship born into a human named Jesus in the sense that God's a new kid in short there after the existence of God the Father, because he is called as a child.
The most interesting thing to mention is about the third person of the Holy Spirit which is precisely terbeda part of her nature with the release of God the Father and God the child, so that the Father is not the child and the child nor Father or the Holy Spirit.
When something becomes a point of difference at the same point of privilege to one person, then the difference and privilege it must also exist on the substance of those responsible. For example, one person has the distinction and privilege to be a child, the substance must have contributed to the child.
This means that a substance is a substance children, because these elements can not be separated than the substance itself. If the difference and privilege it is on substance, then it should be unisex on the substance of God, because both substances only one.
Therefore, something had to be differences and privileges to one person then he may not be there in person to another.
According to the example above, the privileges of being a child may not have the elements of the Father.
When he is not on the person of the Father, then it does not exist in essence.
When it is not in its essence, then it is not on the substance of God.
Because substance by substance of God the Father are one (unity).
Thus it came to pass at the time that one, there is the nature of these privileges in God and no matter the nature of the substance of God's privileges.
For example, God's children are born into a human.
When God became a man child, then the substance of God the Father must be human because of their substance (in accordance with the principle of monotheism). But in reality, according to the Christian world that God the Father did not become man. Thus God does not mean the substance to be human.
So at the time of the Lord God called to the man and not the substance of God became man, hence the two opposite and a concept that is impossible.
Doctrine of the Trinity to acknowledge the existence of God the Father, God the son and God the Holy Spirit can only be learned and can be accepted only if the Christian world mendefenisikannya as 3 figure different God and miss each other, in the sense recognized that God is not one, but three ( Trialisme).
No one will deny that God is eternal, Alpha and Omega, no beginning and no end, but the presence of God who became a child and was born in human form were dispelled eternity of God in the Christian world, because the real is the Father, and no child alias was no God first first one is referred to as God's highest and there is also a new God exists after the first God was there.
Human reason can justify, if the Father in the true sense must first have of their children.
The human mind will argue that the first child of the father or the child together with the Father, because if so there would not appear terms Father and son.
When God the Father and God the child has been separated from his immortality, then the child of God can not be called 'begotten' by God the Father. because God the Father and God the child when it is equally timeless, Alpha and Omega, equally berpermulaan and no earlier and the later presence.
When he called begotten, then so that it is later than the Father. Because once again, children who should be there later than the actual father.
When between God the Father and God the son was different from all eternity, God the Holy Spirit has eternity different from each, they are not a single entity but three distinct elements.
This statement is supported by the New Testament itself, the first evidence we read in the Gospel written by Matthew chapter 3 verses 16 through 17:
"After being baptized, Jesus immediately came out of the water, the heavens opened and he (Jesus) saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove perched upon it, a voice from heaven (the heaven = heaven?: Ed) who said:" This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. "(Matthew 3: 16-17)
In the above verse directly we see where the 3 elements of substance different God simultaneously, ie one in human form named Jesus to the status of God's children, a tangible like a dove (ie God the Holy Spirit) and one God the Father himself who says of heaven sky high.
Based on evidence from the exposure Matthew, how could the world to defend Christian monotheism argument within the system understand their divine?
Other evidence showing the difference between each of God in the Christian world that is increasingly proving the gulf between God and the other one with God in their unity.
"Jesus said to them again, Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, even so I send you! And after he said this, he (Jesus) breathed on them and said," Receive the Holy Spirit "." (John 20: 21-22)
Paragraph Johanes above as well as Matthew chapter 3 verses 16 and 17, display of keterbedaan of God son and God the Holy Spirit so that it became clear that between God the Father, God the son and God the Holy Spirit there is no bond of unity and can not be called the One God, one -Each has his own personal God, this is the belief system of God (divine pluralism) as well as believed by the Greeks and Romans about the diversity of their gods.
This concept is similar to the concept of 3 creature called man, there is the Amir as Father, there Bland as children and unisex si Robin, three different but still has a private entity, that is one in existence, equally human, but if all three together? Of course not, they are still human beings 3.
God the Father, God the son and God the Holy Spirit is equally God, but they still figure 3 different God, this is actually the concept in understanding the Trinity or Trinity in the Christian world.
As the end of this chapter, we present two other important things as an introduction to critical thinking for people who believe in the idea of the Trinity and believe in the oneness of Jesus with God.
First, Trinity Christian world believes that Jesus is the Son of God and God himself, who was born a man to accept suffering on the cross to redeem Adam's offense has made the distance between God and man.
Now, if you do, can you declare that at the time of the crucifixion of Jesus happened to be at the same time God the Father (God) has come crucified?
This needs to be raised as a reference right thinking, that when God has decided himself for being born in human form by virgin Mariah then automatically between Jesus with God the Father did not differ, called Jesus just physically humane course but the content of his spirit is God so this makes himself Jesus called God's children.
Under any circumstances for the physical body of Jesus was still alive and doing activities like a human, at that time the Spirit of God was still in the physical body are and can not be separated, because if the Spirit of God has come out of the body roughly the time it was also Jesus' death; because the physical body has been abandoned by her spirit.
So logically, when the physical body of Jesus was crucified, then the substance has also participated crucified God, meaning more clearly, God the Father has joined the cross at the same time (because they are a single unit).
At the time of the physical body of Jesus conversing with the students as well as other friends at the same time it is actually God who did it behind the wadag.
And now when Jesus experienced certain events such as cursing the fig tree because of hunger but he did not find anything there other than the leaf (Matthew 21: 18-19) then this suggests ignorance of self Jesus about everything and the implication that God that fills the soul of wadag man Jesus was not the true God, because he is not omniscient while the creator of this universe must be God who knows His creation even if it is in the form of beings most small and black that are not visible by naked eye running at night darkest though.
And when Jesus was scared to death to peluhnya all over her like drops of blood falling to the ground (Luke 22:44), then at the same time we are witnessing the God of disability, how not, God would be frustrated and disappointed until he wants to die (Matthew 26:38) due to his fear of the attacks of the creatures of his own that should actually be weak and not frightening threat in the eyes of God.
And moments that we find in Matthew chapter 26 verses 36 through 39, Jesus also prayed addressed to God. What a gaffe very significantly, how much God has become flesh in the form of man and God is still in need of help from a third party (in this case God need the Lord's help as well), this is where we actually see the fact that Jesus himself is not God, he just as a creature and the creature itself apart from the rest of the elements of divinity, both physical and spiritual.
Therefore he must really need the help of God, God is omniscient, God is Omnipotent over all things from his creation and that God is All-Strong.
Have you thought about the Trinity as adherents understand these things are more critical. And now the second thing I want to pose as the cover of this first chapter is related back to claim the Trinity would oneness with the Lord Jesus, and they are considered as a single entity, so that Jesus called God itself (hence known as the Lord Jesus).
In many books and articles on the New Testament, we call it for example, Matthew 26:64, Acts 7: 55-56, Romans 8:34 and so were called that Jesus as God's son was sitting on the right hand of the Father, which means that they both (between God the Father and God the children) are two different God, does this not violate its own concept of the oneness of God the Father that Jesus claimed by the trinity itself?
Is not the more clearly we see there are two Gods and not a God, and if they understand the Lord called Tawheed or monotheism, the system of God (more than one God) called the Pluralism God or Polytheism.
Hopefully this can lead you to right thinking, logical and peaceful return to the teachings which you can receive in a straight ... ISLAM.
yours sincerely,
other article
From the Crusades to Kashmir